Will it be a slam dunk for the US sports betting wagering restriction?

By Natalie Sherman

Business reporter, New York

A restriction on sports betting in a lot of US states might be reversed by a case being considered by the Supreme Court.

The state of New Jersey is challenging the 1992 federal law that largely banned sports betting, explaining the matter as a "states' rights" problem.

The case, which began on Monday, follows New Jersey residents enacted 2011 to legalise sports betting wagering.

A group of sports betting leagues opposes wagering on games, which they fear will encourage match-fixing.

Lower courts have actually consistently ruled versus New Jersey, saying it is within the federal government's power to restrict a state's policy options.

The Supreme Court opted to hear the case nonetheless amidst a broader shift in American attitudes towards sports betting.

Before 1976, Nevada - home of the Las Vegas strip - was the only state with legal casinos outside lands.

But over the last few years, states hungry for tax income in the wake of the financial crash have enacted a rash of looser gaming laws, collecting large levies on gaming income.

There are now 24 states with industrial casinos - roughly double the number a years ago.

Despite the official ban, which currently excuses Nevada and three other states, unlawful sports betting wagering is swarming in the US.

Americans place about $154bn in illegal sports betting bets every year, according to the American Gaming Association.

The association's president, Geoff Freeman, explained the federal ban, external as an "utter failure" previously this year.
bet9ja.com
It states the UK is an example of a nation where sports betting is prevalent.

"It's time for Washington to stop denying states of crucial tax profits and allow them to enjoy the rewards of a regulated market," Mr Freeman said.

More than 15 states filed papers in assistance of New Jersey in the case. A handful have currently passed laws to authorise sports betting in case of a modification.

'Times have changed'

On Monday, as lawyers began arguments for the Supreme Court, some more conservative judges appeared sceptical of the existing law.

The court is expected to decide in June 2018.

"If we achieve success here we could have bets being taken in New Jersey within 2 weeks of a choice by the court," stated outbound New Jersey governor Chris Christie after participating in the court hearing. "We're prepared in New Jersey - we're prepared to go."

No matter the court's last judgment, Congress might likewise take up the debate amidst more comprehensive conversation about online gaming and e-sports betting.
bet9ja.com
Even some of the expert sports betting leagues have begun to change their positions on the concern of gambling.
bet9ja.com
Adam Silver, National Basketball Association commissioner, supported a federal law that would produce a consistent set of guidelines throughout the US. "Times have actually altered," he composed in a 2014 viewpoint piece, external.

Addicts fighting with mobile wagering
bet9ja.com
3 October 2017
bit.ly
The tricky problem of problem gambling

31 August 2017
bet9ja.com