For Christmas I got a fascinating gift from a friend - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a couple of simple triggers about me supplied by my friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and very funny in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of writing, however it's likewise a bit repetitive, and very verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's triggers in collating information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 customised books, generally in the US, considering that pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, bphomesteading.com who developed it, can purchase any further copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody creating one in anybody's name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, developed by AI, and designed "solely to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, smfsimple.com but Mr Mashiach worries that the item is meant as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get offered even more.

He wants to widen his range, producing different genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps using an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - offering AI-generated products to human clients.

It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and astroberry.io it does, definitely in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, chessdatabase.science authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar content based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we in fact suggest human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is pictures. It's artworks. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for imaginative purposes must be prohibited, but I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without consent ought to be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely effective however let's construct it ethically and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually chosen to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to utilize developers' content on the internet to help develop their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is likewise highly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and an entire lot of delight," states the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening among its best carrying out industries on the unclear pledge of growth."

A government spokesperson stated: "No move will be made till we are absolutely positive we have a useful strategy that delivers each of our goals: increased control for best holders to help them accredit their content, access to top quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI plan, a nationwide data library consisting of public data from a vast array of sources will likewise be provided to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to increase the safety of AI with, among other things, firms in the sector required to share information of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less guideline.

This comes as a variety of suits versus AI firms, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their consent, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of elements which can constitute fair use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training information and whether it must be paying for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It became one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its innovation for a fraction of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It has plenty of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite hard to read in parts since it's so verbose.

But offered how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm not exactly sure for how long I can remain confident that my significantly slower human writing and modifying abilities, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in international technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents worldwide.

Outside the UK? Register here.