Skip to content

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
    • Help
    • Submit feedback
  • Sign in / Register
S
skateone
  • Project
    • Project
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Cycle Analytics
  • Issues 20
    • Issues 20
    • List
    • Board
    • Labels
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 0
    • Merge Requests 0
  • CI / CD
    • CI / CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Members
    • Members
  • Collapse sidebar
  • Activity
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Issue Boards
  • Chanda Grassi
  • skateone
  • Issues
  • #16

Closed
Open
Opened 3 months ago by Chanda Grassi@chandacue75880
  • Report abuse
  • New issue
Report abuse New issue

How an AI-written Book Shows why the Tech 'Terrifies' Creatives


For Christmas I got an intriguing present from a friend - my very own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was completely written by AI, with a couple of simple prompts about me provided by my friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and extremely funny in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of writing, but it's likewise a bit repeated, and really verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's triggers in looking at information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repetitive hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had sold around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, because rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, wiki.fablabbcn.org who developed it, can order any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone developing one in any person's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, created by AI, and developed "solely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is intended as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get sold even more.

He wishes to broaden his range, generating different categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps providing an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted type of customer AI - offering AI-generated items to human consumers.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar material based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are talking about information here, we really imply human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is pictures. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for creative purposes should be banned, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without permission ought to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very powerful but let's construct it ethically and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually picked to block AI designers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have actually chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to utilize developers' content on the web to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also strongly versus removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of joy," says the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining among its best performing markets on the vague pledge of growth."

A federal government representative stated: "No relocation will be made until we are definitely confident we have a practical plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for right holders to assist them license their material, access to premium material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI plan, a nationwide data library including public data from a wide variety of sources will likewise be made readily available to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to improve the security of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector links.gtanet.com.br needed to share information of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is said to want the AI sector ribewiki.dk to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a number of claims versus AI firms, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their consent, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of aspects which can constitute reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it gathers training information and whether it need to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all enough to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It became the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a portion of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I think that at the moment, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weak point in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It has plenty of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite challenging to read in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But given how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm not exactly sure for how long I can stay confident that my significantly slower human writing and modifying abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in international innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters around the globe.

Outside the UK? Register here.

Please solve the reCAPTCHA

We want to be sure it is you, please confirm you are not a robot.

    Please register or sign in to reply
    Assignee
    Assign to
    None
    Milestone
    None
    Assign milestone
    None
    Time tracking
    No estimate or time spent
    None
    Due date
    No due date
    0
    Labels
    None
    Assign labels
    • View project labels
    Confidentiality
    Not confidential
    Lock issue
    Unlocked
    participants
    Reference: chandacue75880/skateone#16